Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

More issues for st. trayvon. Patron saint and protector of hoodie wearin' punks. Still wonderin' (rhetorically) why Mr. Zimmerman's charges haven't been dropped. Oh yeah. If king hussein could have produced a son................ Good thing he said he ALWAYS gets the facts on a subject before commenting. Right.
1 posted on 05/13/2013 6:55:29 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman
Still wonderin' (rhetorically) why Mr. Zimmerman's charges haven't been dropped. Oh yeah. If king hussein could have produced a son......

If anyone is a criminal lawyer can you explain why Barry's comment wouldn't be grounds for a mistrial? I mean the president weighs in on a case on national media, so any jury would be potentially prejudiced either for or against Zimmerman.

2 posted on 05/13/2013 7:01:00 AM PDT by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Then somebody pushed Trayvon because the headset just fell.

We're supposed to believe that's the only explanation for his headset falling off?

4 posted on 05/13/2013 7:43:26 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

“On the 911 call from Witness #11 one hears in the background forty-two seconds of screaming. The man on the tape yells “help” over and over.”

Good point. Has there EVER been a case where someone who’s had a gun pointed at them just began screaming and screaming for 42 seconds?

Typically that person will 1. Shut up., 2. Plead with the person with the gun, 3. Run away.

So we’re supposed to believe he’s screaming “help help help he has a gun! Help Help Help! He’s pointing a gun at me! A Gun! Help Help!” ??


5 posted on 05/13/2013 7:46:06 AM PDT by MNDude (Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Perhaps Mr. Zimmerman will be released and his political trial tossed into the dumpster about the time the anti-Mohammed video producer is released.


7 posted on 05/13/2013 8:22:17 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Importantly, Crump is not a “court officer” in this trial, so the judge has refused for him to be examined by the defense, even after obviously conspiring with the woman to tamper with the jury.

So the best bet might be a civil suit directed at Crump and the woman, which could be used to force legal discovery on both of them, which might overcome his pretensions of being her legal counsel.

While she might refuse to testify in the lawsuit using the 5th Amendment, which is not usually done, it would expose her as an adult, and make her a public figure, so none of her false evidence could be used by the prosecution.

Since Crump made the statements public, they are not protected as such by the attorney client privilege, so indirect evidence that they are blatant lies could really slap them both.


9 posted on 05/13/2013 8:35:36 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
It wasn't an immunity hearing in April. It was a motion hearing on several, many involving Crump’s shenanigans. GZ’s defense still has the option of a Stand Your Ground immunity hearing during or after the trial. If his defense went forward with one now, GZ would have been required to answer every one of the judge's questions putting all of his defense cards on the table before the trial. Also a loss in a SYG hearing would slightly help the prosecution.
12 posted on 05/13/2013 9:12:55 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Did learn something from this article. I always thought that a great chunk of the MSM’s fantasy evidence against GZ came from Crump. Turns out that for all practical purposes, all of it did.
13 posted on 05/13/2013 9:20:58 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Unless Zimmerman’s lawyers make a huge mistake during jury selection his trials will end in hung juries.And after the second or third hung jury in Florida Attorney Corporal Holder will weigh in on the issue.


14 posted on 05/13/2013 9:29:19 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Leno Was Right,They *Are* Undocumented Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Since Dear Leader who was elected with 94% of the black vote and he has weighed in on this case against the defendant, I think blacks should be excluded from the jury entirely.

To counterbalance that so should all white hispanics just to be fair — even though GZ is entitled to a jury of his peers.

Now let’s start from there and find a fair jury.


15 posted on 05/13/2013 10:31:25 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson