Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

In times gone by, I might have agreed with the concept. But not since the once-proud Aussies allowed themselves to be disarmed.


39 posted on 05/12/2013 1:42:05 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
I love this idea that we are disarmed in Australia.

There are at least a million legally held firearms in private hands in Australia.

Personally, I have one of these:

and one of these:

as well as a number of basic hunting rifles. And I could own more, but I've only got two hands so these will do.

It's certainly not rosy here for gun ownership - universal licencing and registration, for example - and my handgun is a .38 because having anything heavier is complicated for reasons that make very little sense. But we're not disarmed, and plenty of places in the US has some stupid rules as well.

40 posted on 05/12/2013 2:52:22 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson