Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Video footage of news reports follows evolution of failed White House narrative on Benghazi.

Edward Daley does an excellent job piecing this entire nightmare into historical context.

Given this opportunity to review these video snippets, one notices a blaring consistent denial.

At 8:50 Obama was addressing the UN General Assembly in NYC and stated the following:

"Now, I have made it clear the United States government had nothing to do with this video"

At 13:00, and NBC News Special Report covers Hillary at the podium speaking to a 9/14/2012 'Ceremony for Americans Killed in Libya Attack' stating:

"We've seen rage and violence directed at Americans embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with."

Who, in their right mind would have immediately thought the White House would be responsible for such a video in the first place?

It's this immediate persistence with uniform and repetitive denial of 'responsibility' for a video only a few dozen people on the planet were aware of on 9/11/2012 exposes both Hillary & BHO's denials into serious doubt.

1 posted on 05/08/2013 3:02:06 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wtd
TREASON is the reason!


2 posted on 05/08/2013 3:05:21 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wtd

[[Who, in their right mind would have immediately thought the White House would be responsible for such a video in the first place? ]]

The FIRST thing our dear leader and ilk did was to BLAME AN AMERICAN!!! they didn’t blame terrorists, they didn’t blame even the fictional ‘protestors’ that they just made up out of thin air- THEY BLAMED AN AMERICAN for inciting the fictional ‘protestors’

That’s how much oyur dear leader thinsk of this great coutnry of ours- He threw America under the bus- and when he got caught, he threw a snit fit-


3 posted on 05/08/2013 3:11:05 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wtd
In addition to the above listed denials by Obama and Hillary, take note of this little detail provided by pdf: Walid Shoebat in his exclusive report about the filmmaker, Nakoula, scroll to page 12 of 23:
"I then obtained a radio interview that this supposed Nakoula gave in Arabic during which he stated that he is not Christian but a secular liberal. He was asked, “What is your position on the Jewish and the Christian faith?” Nakoula responded, “I have no calling for these religions”.

During his interview, Nakoula was fixated on defending the Feds.

“Why do you defend the U.S. government continually?” The interviewer asked. “The U.S. has no link to this movie whatsoever,” Nakoula responded. It was all part of the deal he made to cooperate with the Feds.

Yet this even further hurts the Feds.


4 posted on 05/08/2013 4:33:38 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson