And have you bothered to actually READ any of them??? The data for LENR is solid, with many well-done studies available.
I'm not all that interested in theory, as theory means squat as to the scientific reality of a topic. So, once again I recommend Charles Beaudette's book "Excess Heat", which does a great job of covering the experimental evidence proving CF exists and works.
“The data for LENR is solid”
No, it is not, and you are no expert in nuclear physics to make such a statement.
“which does a great job of covering the experimental evidence proving CF exists and works. “
Not a single solitary cold fusion device has ever been independently proven. Not a single one.
If there had then there would be billions of dollars thrown at productizing it into a trillion dollar industry.
The author is plainly supportive of the claims of “cold fusion”, fair enough, he has his opinions. But in conclusion he blames the skeptics for demanding the wrong proofs from the P-F experimenters.
The skeptical scientists demanded a nuclear explanation, says the author, while the F-P was a non nuclear phenomenon. The chemists vs. the nuclear physicists and never the twain shall meet.
It is into the F-P experiments that Rossi tries to include himself with p.r., imaginary working models, a new and equally inexplicable science but with a secret!
The author seems to want to throw the burden of proof onto the shoulders of the skeptics, “prove me wrong!”, instead of recognizing that without a clear understanding of what is occurring the "cold fusion" folk have a nice lab experiment and a question not a world saving technology.