As opposed to the people with no food starving to death? Good grief, do you even read what you write? Is it better a child have soy protein to sustain life, or is it better that he die a gruesome death and not have to worry about your silly and unfounded fears?
Moronic fretting like this is why my kids have to learn in school about how wonderful Rachel Carson was even though she is responsible for more death than Stalin, Hitler, and Mao combined. It's also why one of the greatest Americans remains relatively unknown. Norman Borlaug saved a billion people, mostly children, from starvation by pioneering GMO foods. Yet Rachel Carson is in the school books because, like you, she opposed scientific progress. It's just plain insidious and I have no patience for people who intentionally promote this idiocy.
I’m not the one fretting.
I packed the food because I realize some nutrition is better then none.
My concern about our food no longer being simply the way it was designed to be, is not silly or unfounded.
I just wondered the source of the prodcuts as I packed them and the quality and wondered were we supplying foods that may sustain life but slowly snuff it another way.
I would like to help people in ways that is not hindering them in others. IE: save their life today so they are sick with some illness not too far down the road.
I answer to God. We all are gonna die of some thing. I don’t fear death, it seems you do?
There are other options for your childrens schooling if you don’t like what their current school teaches.