[OneWingedShark]

>> RE: They’re both statists, and socialists, who have no concept of the proper limits of authority for the position of President. — How are they different?
>>
>I just outlined the difference above.

Ah, differences without any distinction.

> Better a lesser statist than the one that we have.
> If you want to find the perfect man, you’re never going to vote in any election.

Honestly, who said anything about 'perfect'?
Is a refusal to vote for a Statist (or Socialist) a flat-out rejection of anyone who's not perfect?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Ah, differences without any distinction.

The willingness to cut taxes IS a distinction.

RE: Is a refusal to vote for a Statist (or Socialist) a flat-out rejection of anyone who’s not perfect?

Again, there are DEGREES of desire for statism. I argue that Romney is less ( MUCH LESS ) of a statist than Obama and would have been better (relatively) than what we have now.

We were not given palatable choices in 2012, however, to simply let Obama romp when there was a lesser evil alternative was the wrong thing to do.

THAT is the distinction.