RE: He cannot do that — Congress is in charge of laws, not the President.
Again I am assuming that a Romney victory would carry the Senate and House together.
It is better than just maintaining the lower house.
And my argument still is this — THERE *IS* (emphasis) a difference between a President Romney and a President Obama.
The former ( although imperfect ) would be better.
There's not much to support that assumption -- traditionally the opposite party as the president is likely to make gains in the Congress, IIRC.
It is better than just maintaining the lower house.
And my argument still is this — THERE *IS* (emphasis) a difference between a President Romney and a President Obama.
The difference is that one's a hard-line socialist and the other's a fabian socialist. I grant that much, but I still say they're socialists.
The former ( although imperfect ) would be better.
I honestly have my doubts about that -- a republican congress would likely show less resistance to statism even than they do under Obama, which means that we would be more 'normalized'... Obama at least has some polarizing effects.