Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

The suspicious thing about that copy is that HRS 338-17.8 didn’t become law until 1982. So, how can a BC issued in 1961 cite a law that didn’t exist until 1982 ?


35 posted on 05/01/2013 7:54:10 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: TheCipher

It’s possible that they went back and added that code as an addendum to the birth certificates that fell under that law.. Doubtful, but possible. Notice it’s crooked as though it had been added later.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 8:45:26 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson