Posted on 05/01/2013 4:39:34 PM PDT by null and void
Not that we are surprised, but now there are multiple copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s “real” birth certificate that are surfacing and they are clearly indicating fraud. In a rare move, the Alabama Democrat Party has submitted an amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.
Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.
Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:
“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/
See FRmail :)
Hoosiermama, null and void
Along w the signatures, the fact that Madelyn setup a trust for 0 says a lot.
Would she leave a sizable chunk of money to someone that wasn’t a relative? I don’t think she would.
Null and void,
Many thanks for the ping!
Someone important wanted the kid to have money, so it was funneled through Madelyn, since she was the purported grandmother, it looked reasonable. What easeir way to fund the kid.
The flood of U.S. bc fakes is intentional; Decoys. 0bama’s favorite technique.. ‘Hey, look over here (U.S.)!’ This means, look at Kenya for the answer.
Kindly add me to the ping list. Thank you!
Done!
” Stuff is gonna leak out over time.”
Yeah, but not soon enough.
If the copy is certified, then it may be self-authenticating by use of court rule, various authorizing statutes, or Ala.R.Evid. 902(1) through (4) (dealing with certified copy or copies under seal). Should an uncertified copy be offered, then the authenticating foundation set out in Rule 901 must be established. Courts applying Rule 901 admit uncertified records only if they are accompanied by testimony of the custodian, or some other witness qualified to testify, that the record does come from the public office where such documents are customarily kept.
It's time to put Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D. on the stand and/or to make the HI DOH directly release any and all of its record to the court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.