To: 0.E.O
Both. What I meant here is that creationism's validity is based both on a literal Biblical hermeneutic and factual science observations. I did not mean that it was possible for evolutionism to disprove creationism with scientific fact.
However, theistic evolution is a Scripturally indefensible oxymoron.
15 posted on
04/29/2013 12:22:24 PM PDT by
imardmd1
(Let the redeemed of The LORD say so, whom He hath redeemed from the hand of the enemy. (Ps. 107:2))
To: imardmd1
Perhaps I’ve misunderstood, but I wonder what factual scientific observations have shown the existence of God.
And if you are planning t mention irreducible complexity, I will ask the same question of it ... what factual scientific observation have shown that irreducible complexity is proof of the existence of God?
20 posted on
04/29/2013 1:00:19 PM PDT by
dmz
To: imardmd1
Both. What I meant here is that creationism's validity is based both on a literal Biblical hermeneutic and factual science observations. What scientific observation supports the idea that everything was done in 6 literal days?
28 posted on
04/29/2013 1:43:24 PM PDT by
0.E.O
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson