Then he killed her, too. A whole bunch of innocent people. Makes no sense to me.
I could see someone flipping out and killing a tormenter or two or three. But none of the dead ever did a thing to him. So it's hard for me to buy this explanation that he was picked on. He was just evil and now, I hope, he resides in Hell.
A bunch of high school boys gang rape this gal at a party which gets out of control. A few years later, she methodically tacks them down one by one and puts a bullet in them. Clint, the detective, is in hot pursuit of these multiple seemingly random murders and discovers the link just before she kills the last guy, the only one of the group who had turned into a semi-worthwhile human being. He tries to buy her off to no avail.
Clint arrests her shortly thereafter, hears her side of the story, tosses the murder weapon into a trash can and lets her go.
Cases where someone uses violence to get “even” with being bullied has the perp targeting those he/she feels wronged by. In this case, Lanza attacked innocent five and six year olds that he had never had any contact with. Being bullied, even if he was, didn’t drive Lanza to shoot up a classroom full of Kindergarteners.
No proof of life - No proof of death - No proof in any of this contrived BS war on America.