Okay, I’ll grant that England had faced a couple of SOMEWHAT situations before.
It’s very a minor point anyway, and it really doesn’t change your shipload of FAIL.
My point was that there was nothing wrong with the Calvin’s Case decision.
Fact is, there is a boatload - never mind that, there is a CRUISELINER-load of legal authorities, REAL legal authorities throughout history, that say you’re full of it.
And you, some guy on the internet, are supposedly smarter than all the assembled judges of England, all of the Supreme Court, and virtually every REAL legal authority in history.
If you’re so damn smart, why aren’t you on the Supreme Court?
Now see, this is another one of those fallacies of false equivalency. You are equating my suggestion that the Judges of England might have been motivated by something other than the law as being the same thing as me thinking i'm "smarter than all the assembled judges of England, all of the Supreme Court, and virtually every REAL legal authority in history."
I believe the Latin for this is "non sequitur."