Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston
cite the law that supports your assertion that one born under Obama's birth circumstances is NOT a U.S. citizen.

I'll take that as an admission that you realize there is no law under which Obama qualifies for birthright U.S. citizenship.

He may have naturalized as a U.S. citizen at some later point, though.

224 posted on 04/18/2013 6:57:40 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Rides3
I'll take that as an admission that you realize there is no law under which Obama qualifies for birthright U.S. citizenship.

Our basic citizenship law was not a statutory law. It was a COMMON LAW DEFINTION, AND A COMMON LAW RULE.

Cite the statutory law, passed in the early days of our Republic, under which YOU qualify for birthright citizenship. You can't, because it doesn't exist.

Like I say, you're acting like a poster child for birther nutjobbery.

You demand that I cite a statutory law under which Obama qualifies for citizenship, when you can't cite one under which YOU qualify for citizenship.

I cite the actual law, and you simply deny that it exists, when I've spelled it out quite clearly.

You demand I cite a statutory law under which Obama qualifies for citizenship, insisting he doesn't, when you can't cite a statutory law that says he doesn't.

Ah, but every requirement applies to ME. NO requirement at all applies to YOU.

Those are the clear indications of a DENIALIST NUTJOB.

So thank you for announcing to the world that you're a denialist nutjob. Because that's all you've accomplished here.

225 posted on 04/18/2013 7:07:29 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson