Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
The New York Legislature passed a law in violation of the Premise upon which Lynch v Clarke was based. The Court said English Common law applied, the Legislature said "no it didn't."

States generally tended to adopt the English common law, and then change whatever parts of it they liked.

218 posted on 04/18/2013 3:54:16 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
States generally tended to adopt the English common law, and then change whatever parts of it they liked.

How about the Federal Government, did they adopt the English common law concept known as "ad fidem Regis" ?

According to Lord Coke himself:

Whatsoever is due by the law or constitution of man, may be altered; but natural ligeance or obedience to the Sovereign cannot be altered .

Why thank you Lord Coke for clearing that up. Yes, I can see the principles of American law established quite clearly there in your statement. Hooray! Our Citizenship is based on English Subjugation! Who knew?

I wonder how long it will take for you to eventually realize that the concept of Jus Soli is a bondage chain.

244 posted on 04/19/2013 7:23:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson