[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

I am curious as to why Larry Klayman, a licensed Florida attorney didn't file a proper petition for 'Writ of Mandamus' the first time. Logic suggest it would be common knowledge to him to know the proper court procedures since he practices in Florida.

[OKRA2012]

He must have hired Orly Taitz as his co-counsel.

[Triple]

Did the court state what the deficiency was?

The court could be playing games. (Paper not white enough, margin on right too narrow, wrong font)

[prisoner6]

Has Klayman EVER won a case?

[iontheball]

Note the original filing by Klayman was a notice of appeal.
Then the court unilaterally characterized it as a Petition for Mandamus. Since Klayman’s filing was never intended as a Mandamus petition, there is no way that his filing would have conformed to a Mandamus format.

[Ann Archy]

Larry Klayman is Either HAPLESS, or a DEMOCRAT!! Pick one.

[Seizethecarp]

“I am curious as to why Larry Klayman, a licensed Florida attorney didn’t file a proper petition for ‘Writ of Mandamus’ the first time.”

Sometimes a lawyer “throws long” to try to gain a particular advantage, but the court doesn’t buy it. Then the lawyer has to run a different, less preferred play.

At least the case is still alive and since the court took it upon itself to characterize the filing as a request for a writ of mandamus, the court is affirming standing, it would seem, if Klayman can prove up his claims.

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus

“In the American legal system it must be a judicially enforceable and legally protected right before one suffering a grievance can ask for a mandamus. A person can be said to be aggrieved only when he is denied a legal right by someone who has a legal duty to do something and abstains from doing it.”

[EDINVA]

maybe it’s too late at night, but it’s not yet April 29, 2013?