But if a person never marries, is that person’s life lesser than a married person’s? The opportunity to make a million dollars is also there, but most people miss that mark by a mile as well.
“But if a person never marries, is that person’s life lesser than a married person’s? The opportunity to make a million dollars is also there, but most people miss that mark by a mile as well.”
I understand what you’re getting at here, but ultimately that opinion is subjective in nature, and when arguing against homosexual “marriage”, you need to stick to objective things, not rhetorical questions intended to stump your opponent. The debate does not revolve around questions of happiness, or pointing out that some heterosexual guys can’t get a girlfriend and marry, but of the very design of human sexuality and the intended meaning of marriage. If you want to have fun with rhetorical questions, ask them to define what marriage is, then poke holes in it. Take them down the slippery slope of polygamy, bestiality, etc. and either force them to agree that such things are okay, or watch them squirm as they try to argue against that.