Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Please read and comment!
1 posted on 03/27/2013 12:49:17 PM PDT by RochesterNYconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: RochesterNYconservative
where to start ...

If marriage is a privilege, then any state or federal government can extend that privilege to anyone it so chooses. Why are you advocating for this privilege to be extended to sexual degenerates and therefore condone their adoption of children to be indoctrinated?

44 posted on 03/27/2013 1:43:15 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

bfl


45 posted on 03/27/2013 1:44:46 PM PDT by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

Next will be that married couples have a right to children, whether they can biologically produce them or not. This is easily fixed by the state simply awarding children to gay couples. The state can just “tax” children away from couples that have more children than they need, and allocate them more fairly to those that have none.

Don’t laugh.


46 posted on 03/27/2013 1:47:12 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

Hate to burst your bubble...but libtards cannot comprehend logic...or reason...

Might as well talk to the wall... you will get the same result...


48 posted on 03/27/2013 1:57:49 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

Actually it’s a pretty silly strawman of a question. It’s a right, but it’s a right to a VOLUNTARY relationship by both people. That’s the difference between a right and a guarantee, you have a RIGHT to associate with whoever you chose, but you have no GUARANTEE that they too will chose, and their right of association includes the option to tell you to go away.


50 posted on 03/27/2013 1:58:20 PM PDT by discostu (Not just another moon faced assassin of joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

Does marriage equality mean the woman’s vagina is the same as the man’s anus?


51 posted on 03/27/2013 1:59:03 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative

I have a much simpler approach. I just tell them that I don’t believe there should ANY limits on marriage. When they say that there should, I call them a bigot and a hater.


52 posted on 03/27/2013 1:59:23 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RochesterNYconservative
Good logic. Rush has championed this same thought frequently. "Equality of opportunity, not of outcome." Alexis de Tocqueville nailed this in 1830. Mark Levin makes a star of de Tocqueville in Ameritopia

RUSH: I'm still stuck on and amazed by the Tocqueville phrase "the perils of equality" and how the original Americans fought "the perils of equality." Back in the early 1800s, our population, our country, our culture was hell-bent on making sure there was no such thing as "equality" in terms of equality of outcome. And they actually looked at that as a peril, and they formed associations in various ways to make sure that that didn't happen.

53 posted on 03/27/2013 1:59:23 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson