Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ObozoMustGo2012

She’d lose to Rand Paul.


3 posted on 03/21/2013 7:55:46 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BarnacleCenturion

If Rand can survive the establishment republicans, you might be right. His libertarian tendancies and his dovish foreign policy would get him some votes from the left, or at least turn out the younger republicans. I do fear Karl Rove and the rest of the talking heads on Fox News would destroy him though. They, along with Wall Street, woild rather have Hillary since she is more willing to tolerate them earning income through graft and fraud.


19 posted on 03/21/2013 8:03:27 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion

“She’d lose to Rand Paul.”

I don’t think so... She should, just as Obama should have lost, but the stupid voters will vote for the first woman president just as they voted for the black one.

If Clinton runs the only way we have a chance is to run a woman candidate.

JMHO


36 posted on 03/21/2013 8:22:08 AM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BarnacleCenturion
She’d lose to Rand Paul.

Not with his Amnesty plan, not anymore.
41 posted on 03/21/2013 8:31:03 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson