Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345
"Apparently, they had troubles decoding more complicated molecules."

Not exactly. To "decode" a molecule (or other entity), you want the item to remain intact to the maximum extent possible (to get it's "parent mass"). The larger the molecules get, the more places they have available to break apart. If there is too much fragmentation, you lose the ability to extract the structural info.

Yet to get the molecule to work at all, you have to get it into the gas phase, remove at least one electron (to get it charged so the electric and magnetic fields can "steer" it, or accelerate it so that different mass fragments can be detected).

Past methods of ionization involved hitting the vaporizing molecules with a beam of electrons, or charged particles, which can be TOO energetic for the less stable giant molecules. So you need a kinder/gentler ionization means. This is one approach of several.

And the above is a VERY simplistic picture.

15 posted on 03/17/2013 5:15:40 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Okay, but the molecule can’t be intact. At least in my limited understand of how a mass spec works you ionize the sample and then based on charge, separate the resulting ions.

How can you infer what the molecule is made of by preserving it? Without ionizing it?

Do you hit the molecule with different wavelength photons?

24 posted on 03/17/2013 8:27:18 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson