Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Assault; Lonesome in Massachussets

You know, regarding my question to Lonesome in Massachussets about a theoretical upper limit on the number of possible orbits, we may be looking at a situation where there are an infinite number of possible three-body orbits out there. Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Could you imagine the possibilities for life, and all the different environments it might inhabit?


22 posted on 03/10/2013 6:59:34 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
It looks like they are looking for periodic solutions, solutions that repeat.

Laplace, in Mécanique Céleste claimed to have "proven" that the solar system is stable. Newton thought that God had to intervene periodically to prevent chaotic disintegration of the solar system. When Napolean asked Laplace about the place of God in his universe, Laplace is said to have replied, "Sire, je n'ai pas besoin de cette hypothèse". (Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis.) We know now that Laplace was wrong, but wrong with style. He was very right about a great number of other things.

I don't think you can properly introduce the three body problem without at least a mention of Poincaré.

24 posted on 03/10/2013 7:25:06 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (What word begins with "O" and ends in economic collapse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson