To: jiggyboy
Now I can drive a little faster and be a little less attentive, because I know my Volvo will stop itself if necessary. This times 1M. I work auto claims and you can't imagine how many people will blame their rear sensors for not going off (or saying the person wasn't there because they didn't). Except, of course, they were there or we wouldn't be talking. Or the people that only use their rear cameras to back. I can't wait until we start getting the claims from the cars that parallel park themselves, but fail.
20 posted on
03/06/2013 8:51:01 AM PST by
mykroar
(Sig is pending a Conservative party.)
To: mykroar
I’ll bet you’re really looking forward to the Googlemobile self-driving car.
27 posted on
03/06/2013 9:08:53 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
To: mykroar
“I can’t wait until we start getting the claims from the cars that parallel park themselves, but fail.”
They had a self-parking Lexus on an episode of Top Gear. It took FOUR ATTEMPTS for it to replicate a half-assed parallel parking job by a human.
44 posted on
03/06/2013 10:35:00 AM PST by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
(I'll stop being a cynic when the world stops giving me reasons to be cynical.)
To: mykroar; jiggyboy
Mrs WBill's car has a rear sensor and an attention-getter that beeps politely when something is in the way. It's great for backing up and finding a curb, or avoiding carelessly parked bicycles.
But that's about all of the driving I'd want a car to do for me.
This sounds like a bad, bad idea.
49 posted on
03/06/2013 10:55:43 AM PST by
wbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson