Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ExxonPatrolUs
What this idea suggests that you ought to be paying tax on anything you own, be it a home or a pair of socks. What it suggests is that I ought to be paying rental fees for the undershorts I am wearing. If not, there is an imputed rental I am escaping by owning my skivvies, therefore I ought to be taxed on that imputed income I ought to be making to rent a pair.

That's BS. Real estate taxes are already a bummer since you really are already "renting" your home from the local government. If you do not pay those taxes, the government takes it from you and boots you out.

2 posted on 02/27/2013 1:59:39 AM PST by imardmd1 (An armed society is a polite society -- but dangerous for the fool --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

Yep. This whole concept of imputed income should be taken out and shot. It seems to me to be the result of a group of eight year olds playing grownup.


3 posted on 02/27/2013 5:46:02 AM PST by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: imardmd1

bump


4 posted on 02/27/2013 5:52:13 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson