[count-your-change]

With some 14,000 replications of the phenomena (that's the figure quoted before on one the “cold fusion” threads) by such as MIT, NASA, etc., it would seem scientists are far from being united as cronies in being anti cold fusion.

Even Purdue University has been doing experiments and generating dense papers on the subject and Purdue is hardly a bastion of radical faddishness.

“And if so, the NORMAL practice of science will eventually disclose the truth.”

And NORMAL science is disclosing the truth....no one wants to put large amounts of money into something that they don't believe has a chance of producing value in the future, either as pure research or as a practical application.

Claims of container sized water heaters and waiting customers that should have been treated with utmost
skepticism have been greeted with sunny credulity on the cold fusion sites by the cheer leaders of cold fusion even when fraud was indicated.

“The world does NOT need you and a few others to protect it from itself. That mode of thinking is “of the left”. In other words, you're just another vigilante censor”

“vigilante censor”? “of the left”? Why not Luddite and Nazi and anti catalyst?

“The world does NOT need you....” I'm just not feeling the love here.

[Wonder Warthog]

"Even Purdue University has been doing experiments and generating dense papers on the subject and Purdue is hardly a bastion of radical faddishness."

Really?? Who a Purdue is being so brave??

"“vigilante censor”? “of the left”? Why not Luddite and Nazi and anti catalyst?"

Because they aren't descriptive of what is being done on these threads.

"“The world does NOT need you....” I'm just not feeling the love here."

You're right. I don't love self-appointed vigilante censorship nor those who engage in it.