It is funny that just a few short days ago there was a item on here about LAPD confiscating or out right stealing weapons taken from law abiding citizens. There was rightly an outrage expressed on this site.
This is the same site that expresses support for others who take up arms against tyranny. The suggestion is frequently repeated here. Dorner was wrong and cruel, but not much differnt than those for whom he worked.
There was support expressed on this site when an individual flew a plane into an IRS building a few years ago.
I fail to see how Dorner is significantly different.
Am I to assume that we here support police copruption? LAPD is certainly rife with corruption. Do we support kicking retarded arrestees, or any other handcuffed individual? Sorry, even our military doesn’t do that. Do we support cops firing wildly at people in a pick up because it matched a description? That is outrageous conduct by law enforcement and again, rules of engagement forbid such action by our mililtary, why would we accept it by the police? Clearly the officers that shot the BOA robbery suspects years ago let them bleed out and die, demonstrating their wish to kill who they choose. They clearly intended to kill Dorner, yet we object when the government wishes to use drones to remove suspected terrorists, us citizen or other wise. And of course we often post pictures of the LA riots showing how police fail to serve when most needed.
Many police take property unjustly. They act in an egotistical, aggressive, vengeful, self serving manner, they care little about those they are charged to protect. They view themselves as an occupying army and conduct themselves accordingly. They talk about us against them when they are supposed to be an extension of us, of the rule of law. I am a supporter of law and order and the police departments, but not of the methods they often employ. Most police are nothing more than bullies.
But don’t forget, Dorner was one of them. He was overly aggressive when it served his agenda, he was vengeful, self serving, he was one of them. The entertaining thing about this whole venture is the cops seemingly fired the only member of their force capable of shooting and waging a one man war. Given police behavior they should have kept Dorner to further thier agenda, but sadly he thought kicking retarded people was wrong, but surely they could have made him see the light.
I’m sure to get censored or booted off of here, but doewsn’t anyonoe else see the hypocrisy in this?
JimS
No. Do we support every political person with an R behind his/her name? No!
Dorner was wrong and cruel, but not much different than those for whom he worked.
How many of those for whom Dorner worked shot a young woman in the face and killed her?
They clearly intended to kill Dorner
You have definite proof of that in your possession?
. Most police are nothing more than bullies.
Where did you acquire that information? A university study?
But don’t forget, Dorner was one of them.
Dorner was also a Navy Reservist. Are you going to indict everyone who served our country in the Navy?