This, oddly enough, reminds me of a murder case that was tried in Texas a few years ago. The perp was a woman who'd had a really bad marriage. When she had the chance she deliberately ran over her husband, often enough to kill him. At trial she argued what a horrible man he was. The female prosecutor took all the bark off her by saying the law offered a whole menu of horrible things she could legally do to him and/or have the courts do to him, so she didn't have any legitimate cause at all to go beyond the law and murder him.
The same applies to Dorner, just a whole lot more. He's a visually impressive articulate black man and a former full lieutenant (that rank's equivalent to a captain in the Army, Air Force, and Marines) in the Navy reserve, the very kind of guy who could get a publisher and a team of high powered lawyers, and sell a major expose of the LAPD, even if he didn't have much of a case. Just look at the Duke Rape Case and the Trayvon Martin case for examples of how skillfully playing the race card can make the innocent look guilty. Here, OTOH, if this guy is to be believed, he actually had a good case of abuse and cover up.
That, of course, just makes the frightful things he did all the worse, just as that woman murdering her husband when she had massive legal recourse available was made truly horrible by her failure to use that recourse.
The shootup of the Toyota PU has me wondering if we’re even hearing a shred of truth from the MSM and the LAPD on this.
The turds that did that need to stand trial for attempted murder. How much more is there that we have yet to find out?