Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TropicanaRose; papertyger
They would just transfer the baby-daddy’s responsibilities to the government, which furthers the liberal goal of having as many people dependent on government as possible.

Great point. The "paper abortion" is a salve to the conscience of a man who would prefer not to be consciously aware of the link between sex and reproduction, and would rather the government take his children.

It bears repeating: a woman's ability to become pregnant and bear a child as the result of sexual activity is NOT a bug -- it's a FEATURE.

39 posted on 02/03/2013 1:54:26 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: thecodont

There’s no dependent to transfer responsibility for if there’s no pregnancy.

Women prize security. They have that now with their “choice” of abortion, or legally forcing their partner to finance their decision to give birth.

Take away that legally mandated security, and they will act in their own best interests. We have failed to eliminate the former, so the obvious choice is going after the latter.


41 posted on 02/04/2013 12:57:35 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson