To: cuban leaf
We need a little FORTRAN.
And a few GOTOs.
14 posted on
01/31/2013 7:05:40 PM PST by
Scrambler Bob
( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
To: Scrambler Bob
What?
No respect for ALGOL?
What about keypunch operators?
23 posted on
01/31/2013 7:14:51 PM PST by
BwanaNdege
("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
To: Scrambler Bob
34 posted on
01/31/2013 7:25:02 PM PST by
kdot
To: Scrambler Bob
And a few GOTOs.
GOTO’s are for weenies. I’m all about the “alter goto”!
I had to convert some DYL260 programs to COBOL once. Dyl280 is easy, but the only way I was able to convert the DYL260 programs was to decipher parts of them that I could and complete the task by running the programs against small input data sets and compare the output. It actually worked pretty well.
37 posted on
01/31/2013 7:29:16 PM PST by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Scrambler Bob
FORTRAN will be around forever... at least in the scientific community
nothing fancy and not pretty, but in many cases, a few lines worth can still do whats needed to be done
40 posted on
01/31/2013 7:31:23 PM PST by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson