[Lazamataz]

First of all, if the government were to come to disarm you, you would not be able to use an automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let’s be serious. We’re in a world of drones now so the Second Amendment would not help you in that area. It is absurd to try to cite that.

If he would like to articulate this challenge just a hair more directly, I will consider it 'game on'.

[Eye of Unk]

One of my first projects would be a massive air tank say from a large propane tank, I have that, the control valves for quick opening pilot assist valve, ditto check there, a pipe organ array of pipes each loaded with various types of defensive material from timed fireworks mortars to balls of mono filament and possibly timed fuze flak rounds.

Compressed air drives everything.

Now I can just imagine drones descending upon a convention of pumpkin chunkers, which for argumentative shits and giggles also happens to be the gathering place of the local 2A militia.

Lets see how long a drone last there!

or some hog hunting geeks make some remote operative quad Browning A5 shotguns, thats been done before, who says it has to be used just for hogs?

I fear not a drone, I fear the idiots who fear the drones, I have respect for the drone, I have loathing and ill thoughts of the drone operators.

Not exactly something they should brag about when off location at a bar on the weekend.

[RC one]

He believes it is acceptable to use the military against US citizens in order to bring about their disarmament. It seems pretty direct to me. pretty clear. Pretty present.