The bankers who lend to the Federal government, step by step, are moving towards merging U.S. into one world government.
China and Russia would be no problem to merge.
The Chinese military oath is to the Communist party, the total membership of which is a small percentage of the total population, who are simply serfs.
The U.S. military oath is to uphold the U.S. Constitution. The one world government plan is to step by step make small changes to that, likely to include some minor references to some regional group like NATO, or the U.N.
It’s only a percentage of U.S. citizens that have backbone and would balk at the idea of merging the U.S. in any way; the key changes would be attempted to be done as quietly as possible and the evening news would fully support them with propaganda.
Communism and the left is a front for the big lenders, all useful idiots, as are muzzies. Russia and China are really ruled behind the scenes by big capital.
Check it out, FRiends...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russians_by_net_worth
http://www.forbes.com/china-billionaires/
They do business with all the businesses that run the U.S. government.
U.S. politicians would mostly just give in except for a few Republicans, as most are simply obedient order-takers of the money that keeps them in office and can smear them out of office in 2 seconds. All that has to happen to merge from politicians’ point of view is have Congress ratify a treaty.
Twewntynine Palms survey of Marines, 1994
Consider the following statement: `I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government'."The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the Statement.
According to the results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question.
Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines, indicated they would be willing to "fire upon U.S. citizens."
Of that total, 18.67 percent, or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent, or 23 Marines, indicated that they "strongly agree."
A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing at citizens.
Of the total, 42.33 percent, or 127, indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent, or 58, indicated they "disagree."
In his thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on their response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission,"
However, it becomes clear that a poll would be useful in determining which soldiers, and in this case Marines, would be willing to undertake such a mission, to fire upon U.S. citizens."
It's getting closer and closer to the time when the military will have to choose sides. IMO.
- B.H. Obama
Bump
NTSA
Unnamed source supposedly overhearing an unnamed member of the military. No corroboration, no one officially coming forward, no documented evidence. Might has well come from Dan Rather or Alex Jones. Can we get back to critical thinking around here?
Anyone who thinks that Obammy is stupid enough to ask such a question when the answer is obvious (yes they will, just like the East Germans, the Poles, the North Koreans, the Argentinians fired on their own!) needs to get back to kindergarten to re-learn all he needs to know. (The conspiracy nut answers: “That’s why he DID axe! Because nobody would believe that he would!”)