Posted on 01/25/2013 9:04:25 AM PST by central_va
If you want to stop these pro women in combat lunes dead in their tracks ask them this hypothetical question:
You are a General of an Infantry division and your Commander lets you choose one of two enemy divisions to fight. The first enemy division that you could choose to oppose in the upcoming battle is all male. Or you could instead choose to fight the second enemy division that was mixed faggot, women and men. So which enemy division would you choose to fight?
Degrading term.
I have several friends who are homosexual. They're productive citizens and they pay taxes. It's none of my business in what they do in the bedroom.
That said, we can debate whether they should be allowed to serve in the military or whether gay marriage should be permitted but to call them names? We're better than that.
The homosexual agenda being forced on the American people is more degrading.
To put it frankly, real men don’t want technology to give them the capability to bear children, and REAL women don’t want to be in ground combat.
I accept your premise.
Just one thing though. I said I haven’t been to a gym, not that I am out of shape. ;-)
That's why guns are called "equilizers": because a 70 year old out of shape grandmom can take down a 250 pound athletic thug with a decent gun if she knows how to shoot.
link:Combat Barbie
The real problem is more subtle: being in close contact for weeks on end in a small unit. Sexual tension can skyrocket ,,, And that partly depends on behavior (zipper control). Women fought with the infantry in Russia during the second world war and with the Israelis infantry.
The real problem is that this is being pushed for political reasons by feminists who have never been shot at. And women are going to be pressured into "volunteering" while the Pentegon will be pressured into lowering standards to let them serve.
now, for you guys: Here's a nice photo Combat Barbie to keep you happy.
I am not going to read your post until you answer my question. Then I will read your screed.
Well, I have a problem with it, so keep it off FR!
Lighten up. Its a noun of the the verb nag.
1. To annoy by constant scolding, complaining, or urging.
2. To torment persistently, as with anxiety or pain.
I did answer the question. The one who will win is the most professional regiment with the best training and equipment.and holding the high ground helps too.
Boudicca lost because her army wasn’t professional.
The (bisexual) Spartans lost not because they were outnumbered 1000 to one but because a traitor showed the persians the pass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.