Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Does the No Trespassing posting close the “open fields”? I’d say yes, but who knows what the Nine Robed Lawyers will do.

The "open fields" exception to the 4th Amendment is unfortunately very old-- it goes back at least as far as Hester v. United States in 1924, which held that the 4th Amendment didn't require a search warrant for a search of open land, even if that search involved a trespass.

27 posted on 01/22/2013 3:40:52 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

That was before the modern situation of the exclusionary rule; such a situation, even if found to be contrary to the constitution, in that day would not have derailed a criminal prosecution like it does now. Instead, the government could be sued for the allegedly illegal search (and possibly, quite separately, for the trespass). This no longer happens.


29 posted on 01/22/2013 3:45:58 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I always find it amazing that ‘settled case law’ only goes back to say...1920. Anything older is just....old and forgotten.

I see no emanations from penumbras in my copy of Constitution. Damn, I always get the out-dated stuffs


36 posted on 01/22/2013 3:56:57 PM PST by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson