Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Doogle

Great video ‘D’, thanks......Though the F-111 was designed for Naval service It seems to me that it never saw carrier duty. [maybe because of that 10` landing profile would make it very hard to keep the deck in sight] although two of them went to the Med. on a carrier once...


10 posted on 01/22/2013 7:39:21 AM PST by virgil283 ( *- Never give the devil a ride. He will always want to drive.-*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: virgil283

After they built it they realized the tail hook wasn’t any good for its weight. Whenever the tail hook was used it would tear up the belly fairing. Also, it was totally mechanical. Once it was down, you had to physically reinstall it.

Since the USAF doesn’t require a tail hook, except in an emergency, they went with the F-111. They Navy went with the F-14.


11 posted on 01/22/2013 7:55:10 AM PST by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson