“Wow, I’ll give you kudos for knowing that case, however you don’t know WTF you’re talking about.”
Reynolds states explicitly that the federal government has jurisdiction to preserve the definition of marriage as one man and one woman.
“The SCOTUS decided a State issue”
Well, then. I’ve provided a citation that shows otherwise. Show me the legal case that verifies your opinion.
I'll grant you, it's an intersting case, but your conclusions are wrong.
You have yet to cite me a Constitutional authority that gives the Federal Government power over marriage, you've only cited SOTUS.
If you desire homo "marriage"
After you admit it, then we'll talk about semantics.