[Yo-Yo]

Saw several YouTube reviews from SHOT Show 2013, and I must say I don't get it. It's an ergonomic nightmare as a handgun, and I don't get the fun factor or practicality of paying an SBR stamp to hang it under your AR.

[Vendome]

I’m gonna call it “The Conundrum Gun”.

Can’t figure out which way you hold it.... /S

I want one.

[762X51]

Saw several YouTube reviews from SHOT Show 2013, and I must say I don't get it. It's an ergonomic nightmare as a handgun, and I don't get the fun factor or practicality of paying an SBR stamp to hang it under your AR.

YES! YES! and YES! This is the answer to a question NOBODY asked! Useless as two rows of teats on a boar hog! It sucks hard as a "handgun" and even harder as a Federally licensed short barreled rifle. Everybody is an "operator" now days and you've just gotta hang some kind of worthless crap off of all those rails you paid extra money for. Someone ought to invent a set of wheels that attaches to a Picatinny rail...at least that would be useful to roll that mobile garage sale you call a rifle to the range!

[Hardraade]

Don’t know about the ergonomy, but it’s kinda reminiscent of what the FN P90 was meant to be (the original design had a 100rd throwavay box mag w caseless rounds), and the p90, I’m told, is pretty good.

[MediaMole]

The thing that really worries me about this design are the two plungers over the barrel. Especially the re-strike plunger. I’m not so sure I want to put my hand that close to the end of the barrel after a rimfire round has decided not to go bang.

It may “only” be a .22, but I’m pretty sure it will take the tip of my finger clean off if I accidentally cover the muzzle when the round decides to fire.