Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: varmintman

Phobos and Deimos are small, and are obviously either captured asteroids, or were formed from ejecta of impacts on Mars. Phobos has been speculated to be 25-30 percent empty space, iow, a pile of aggregated debris, basically a pile of rubble based on a one or a few largest pieces — much like every other asteroid that has been studied from close up.

The radar study of Phobos was MARSIS, and was by the ESA,, not the Russians.

There was a Russian (alleged) scientist who started claiming back in the 1950s that Phobos was moving irregularly. Naturally, at that time the mass of Mars wasn’t accurately known, and neither was the mass of Phobos for that matter. Here’s fringe website Rense’ page on this:

http://rense.com/general20/eisenhowerWH.htm

Better:

http://www.universetoday.com/58923/could-phobos-be-hollow/

And oddly enough, Wikipedia has the inside scoop:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moons_of_Mars#Mars_moon_hoax


17 posted on 01/18/2013 4:33:03 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Science is not about denying obvious things. Phobos is obviously metallic and that means 100% metallic and it is clearly made of metallic strakes i.e. it is artificial.

Hoagland's take on the subject:

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Phobos.html

44 posted on 01/19/2013 6:53:50 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson