You might also mention Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the abduction of Elian Gonzalez—Just for starters.
Them: “Nobody needs thirty bullets to kill a deer.”
Me: “Just three words for you: Michael J. Fox.”
Serious question. What do we do with libholes? I have tried my best to educate them. They just do not get it. I have no idea what to do when CWII happens.
FDR interned more than 100,000 US citizens with no due process simply by issuing two Executive Orders.
Saying gun rights are to protect us from government is to make the same mistake in the other direction as saying their only to protect us from home invaders. Guns are for a panopoly of self-defense scenarios, including but not limited to home invasion, domestic insurrection, foreign invasion, and tyrannical government.
Tell your coworker that she’s perfectly safe. Most homicides are brothers killing brothers in the ghetto (aka gangbanger turf wars), and even the liberal media doesn’t give a damn about them. And virtually none of those are with assault weapons anyway. In fact, more people are killed with hammers, clubs and other blunt instruments than assault weapons. Maybe she’s in favor of a hammer ban to rid the country of the scourge of blunt instrument crisis?
Is she a truther? If so ask her how she can believe the Fed gov would stage a terrorist attack killing over 3,000 people but she doesn't think they would herd us into ovens.
Didn’t anyone warn you about talking to libholes?
Red coats.