Now we are expecting companies to be the moral guides for our children? What if it was a smaller company that didn’t have the funds to gives away lost replacement pieces was faced with this request and had to turn the boy down? I am sure the liberals would be calling for a boycott proclaiming them to be evil corporate masters that only care about their bottom line.
Actually, no I don’t expect it, and I don’t think this child’s father did, either.
As for what a liberal would be calling for had Lego not sent him the little toy, well...there’s no explaining WHAT liberals do. Certainly calling for a boycott would be foolish, and I would loudly disagree with such action. I myself would have told the child (who is SEVEN, not a teenager), “Well, I guess you’ll have to save up and buy a new one.”
Look, it was a bold thing the kid did — he admitted his guilt (more than what many adults would do) and asked for a favor from the company. The company granted the favor and that’s all. It was a nice thing for them to do, simple as that.
As a mother, I’ve often had to be harsh with my children once they didn’t get the message about responsibility. But after ONE infraction, I’m usually apt to give a little slack. And you know what? I actually LIKE helping people out when I can and when by doing so I will not contribute to further harm. This little boy — practically a baby — did pretty much the right thing given the circumstances of his infraction.
I see that upthread you mentioned that it would have been better had he asked if he could buy the figurine by istelf, without the rest of the toy. Perhaps. Perhaps that’s what I would have suggested to my own child, but I don’t know if I would have even thought of it, to tell the truth.
That said, I do understand your posittion and how you arrived at it. It is not without merit, IMO.
Best regards,