To: Hot Tabasco
So how do you see fit to blame and penalize the players past and present for something the Penn State administration was accused of doing?
Show me where i did that. This is about people who refer to the "adversity" that Penn State and its highest administrators have been through (bad press, NCAA sanctions, firing), without mentioning the children who were abused. It seems misplaced feelings of victimization, no?
They don't acknowledge that their PSU administrators covered up for a child molester. They actually think these administrators, not children, are the ones abused. They sound kind of like you, with that "accused of doing" bit. I guess you also believe PSU admin, including JoePa, did nothing wrong, huh?
Doesn't bode well for self examination to ensure this never happens again.
To: No Left Turn
You keep using the words “cover up” as if they are facts. They aren’t.
The looming trials of Schultz, Curley, and Spanier will determine that. If they ever happen.
You obviously still need some life lessons. So we’ll start with because someone says something - say louis freeh or mike greenberg - it doesn’t make it true.
There is no “cover up”. There was no “cover up”. It makes no sense. If there was a “cover up”, why all the testimony? You run your mouth, but you don’t think.
It was just a bunch of bumbling administrators trying to deal with someone that (at the time) they thought had “boundary issues.”
Looking back, it’s easy to pile on knowing what we know now. At the time, they didn’t know anything. One incident (1998), which was obviously deferred by every local agency.
50 posted on
01/06/2013 5:31:08 PM PST by
FlJoePa
("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson