Avoiding his own words and instead reading his mind to make it fit and what others did?
You’re the one avoiding his words. Where did he advocate destruction? Advocating an event that could lead to destruction, or in another direction, is not advocating destruction. Otherwise, advocating free elections would be the same as advocating for Obama to be president.
As for “what others did”, I was simply trying to illustrate that this is a commonly understood idea amongst people that think about these issues, because you seem to have misunderstood it. That’s why I’m not “reading his mind”; anyone who talks about the ethical issues of intelligent machines is well familiar with the kind of scenario he is talking about, because it’s a textbook problem.