someone has to let them in, it doesn’t just magically go in between a gal’s legs.
before women had a little pride about purity and who they decided to let in, and even if they’d wait until they had a husband. what guy seriously wants to know there’s been a number of guys in their wife before them?
and i’d say the same thing for women. they USED to care, now they sure don’t. they were the controlling factor and they’ve decided not to be anymore, and be just as promiscuous as guys wanted to be but couldn’t - but now both can be because the guys aren’t being waved off but hornily welcomed in.
No, but a tractor beam between her legs doesn't drag it in, either. And as the topic of this thread is fathers being eliminated from the family, pointing out that women aren't forced to have unprotected sex is beside the point.
what guy seriously wants to know there’s been a number of guys in their wife before them?
When it comes to one night stands, many, maybe even most, guys don't care. All they care about is "scoring". I would think a woman having children from multiple fathers would be a sign that she is not a safe bet, but I've seen enough to know most men don't think it through that far.
and i’d say the same thing for women. they USED to care, now they sure don’t. they were the controlling factor and they’ve decided not to be anymore...
Oh, they're still in control. They, or many, are just using that control differently. And with our elected law makers unwilling to alienate the female vote, it should be obvious that men can't count on the government to protect them from "forced fatherhood" or whatever the term is now. Holding mothers responsible by allowing men to opt out? Depriving welfare mothers of their perks? Not going to happen. It's up to men to control themselves.