So his bodyguard must be racist. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144921,00.html
Nobody in Michael Moore’s world has trouble with coyotes, ground hogs, raccoons or rats? Why else would anyone need a gun? What a maroon.
Actually, Mr. Moore, I need guns to protect myself from evil people like Michael Moore, Adam Lanza, and my own government.
Michael:
Just received tow disturbing phone calls.
Seems the zoning commission has determined your diameter requires you install at least one more asshole.
And the Coast Guard has determined you are an invasive species and they mean to harpoon your porcine ass.
Stoopit white man...
The looney left has a “race” problem. They can not think outside the box of “race”.
He's right. If I were racing Michael Moore to the last bit of food, I'd feel the need to have a gun.
The slaves that were brought over are not making any effort to return to Motha Africka. Why?
“I was fascinated by that subject when making Bowling for Columbine, how fear is used to the point where everybody feels like they’ve gotta have a gun in the house,”
Yet, we have morons like MM who use the same fear to drive their own preferred political policies. So, what we really have is a discussion regarding different political policies and which is the best policy regarding the protection of individuals from the risks of living.
Do we want to empower individuals to make the choice that works best for them in their own lives, or do we want to transfer that power from the individual to a centrallized government thousands of miles away and hope that all individuals are willing to voluntarily abide by the central authorities demands.
If we chose my preference then the individual is able to chose their best options in protecting themselves. If we chose MM’s option, then we have to HOPE that all individuals bend to the policies of a governing body that is thousands of miles away. MM must hope that the law breakers and law abiders adhere to the laws written in haste!
In other words, MM depends on the transfer of faith from oneself to a group that is somehow seen as more worthy of that faith. You are supposed to be willing to have faith in people you have most likely never met, yet not have faith in yourself.
Sadly, MM’s ilk is winning. No wonder we have a dying society.
“I was fascinated by that subject when making Bowling for Columbine, how fear is used to the point where everybody feels like they’ve gotta have a gun in the house,”
Yet, we have morons like MM who use the same fear to drive their own preferred political policies. So, what we really have is a discussion regarding different political policies and which is the best policy regarding the protection of individuals from the risks of living.
Do we want to empower individuals to make the choice that works best for them in their own lives, or do we want to transfer that power from the individual to a centrallized government thousands of miles away and hope that all individuals are willing to voluntarily abide by the central authorities demands.
If we chose my preference then the individual is able to chose their best options in protecting themselves. If we chose MM’s option, then we have to HOPE that all individuals bend to the policies of a governing body that is thousands of miles away. MM must hope that the law breakers and law abiders adhere to the laws written in haste!
In other words, MM depends on the transfer of faith from oneself to a group that is somehow seen as more worthy of that faith. You are supposed to be willing to have faith in people you have most likely never met, yet not have faith in yourself.
Sadly, MM’s ilk is winning. No wonder we have a dying society.