Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xrmusn

What I said would be within the scope of most existing regulations. Some jurisdictions are a little more anal retentive about lights (like bumper mounted fogs) that aren’t blessed under their regimes, and require them to be physically covered.

And who ever successfully sued the police to get them to crack down on anything? Puh-leeze.


24 posted on 12/15/2012 5:41:23 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

And who ever successfully sued the police to get them to crack down on anything? Puh-leeze
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
That is basically my point. They just write another ‘law’ to cover it....

Somewhat like Article 134 UCMJ.

They cover everything from bed wetting to sucking your thumb(at least in my day - think that has been updated <:), yet they found the need for an Article 134

If the other 10,999 other in place instructions don’t cover your present situation, USE THIS ONE.

Of course the ‘Old Salts’ of my day would say “UCMJ is like getting away with everything. Now, “Rocks and Shoals” would keep you youngsters in line”.
(Not relayed in quite that tone or eloquence)<: <: <:


45 posted on 12/15/2012 6:32:12 AM PST by xrmusn (6/98 "It is virtually impossible to clean the pond as long as the pigs are still crapping in it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson