Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

i can easily see how you COULD fill 3 movies with everythign that takes place in The Hobbit (the first book I ever read ON PURPOSE - and which led me to a lifelong love of reading, gratefully) - the most he should have tried for is 2- especially if all 3 are not brought out to the theatres in rapid succession.


3 posted on 12/14/2012 4:41:13 PM PST by Mr. K (some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K

He wanted to bring out the fullness of the LOTR world. As I recall reading the Hobbit, and it’s been a few years, it was fairly light in its atmosphere, except when Bilbo met Gollum.


4 posted on 12/14/2012 4:44:23 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

As I understand it, Jackson added stuff based on the context for Gandalf organizing an expedition against Smaug drawn from the appendices of LOTR and the chapter The Council of Elrond in the Fellowship of the Ring.

It makes sense to do this with the movie version being released as a prequel since the viewers are presumed to know Jackson’s version of LOTR.

It’s still not clear to me there’s enough there for three movies, but two would be easy.


13 posted on 12/14/2012 5:09:24 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson