[Perdogg]

In order to prove any thing “fraudulent”, one must prove that someone intended to mislead.

[Ray76]

“Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark’s father was” says Obama in “Dreams from my Father”, yet the WH BC PDF displays “BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA” as the Full Name of Father.

Either “Dreams” or the WH BC PDF is a lie.

For these reasons http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2967425/posts?page=39#39 I believe the WH BC PDF to be a lie.

The WH BC PDF was produced with the intent to mislead. It is for public consumption only, not official. It's only purpose is to deceive the public.

[chrisnj]

Obama/soetoro/whatever-his-name-is claimed that his online digital image of bc is a genuine copy of his bc from Hawaii, and that it proves he was born in Hawaii,
but,
a USA sheriff has proven that that very digital image of his bc is forged.

As the owner of the bc he must know it is forged.
Knowing it is forged and using it to mislead Americans into believing it is a genuine authenticated doc is fraudulent -
there is no and or if but to it!!!

The very act of forging a gov doc is a crime!

[Political Junkie Too]

In order to prove any thing “fraudulent”, one must prove that someone intended to mislead.

Maybe Nancy Pelosi's dual certification forms (one for Hawaii, and another for the remaining states) would be a start in proving intent to deceive? Why the two forms when Republicans used the same form in all states? Why did Pelosi drop the phrase "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" from the all but the Hawaii certification?

-PJ