IOW, LENR has yet to establish a base of “prior art”.
***The Wright brothers were the first to fly, and they did not have to establish a base of “prior art”. Your requirement is just something you think is necessary, but history proves it to be completely wrong.
I reiterate: Can you (are you willing to) comprehend the difference?
Despite your absurd claim, the Wright Brothers were far from "the first to fly". The Wright Brothers certainly did rely on -- and extend -- the base of prior art. There was extensive prior art of glider (and even bird) flight already established
Wilbur and Orville also built on Bernoulli's prior art -- by building their own wind tunnel to measure the forces generated on various shapes by air flowing over them. I know this for a fact, because I have actually touched that wind tunnel.
The Wright brothers could have taught a graduate course in aeronautics. They were certainly capable of defending any technical aspect of their application patents on powered, controlled flight. And it was preceded by plenteous prior art.
~~~~~~~~~~
You are not going to escape that burden of claim by diverting the subject to nit-picking of my near-40-year old patent.
~~~~~~~~
Because I enjoy reminiscing about it, I will (in another comment) explain the patent attorneys' strategic reason for wording that patent as they did.
~~~~~~~~
Meanwhile,