[TXnMA]

Kevmo: "If you have problems with someone’s attitude then take up your own attitude and those of others who have been anti-science on these threads."

TXnMA: "There seems to be no way to have a pleasant, conversational exchange with you."

Kevmo: "***This latest set of exchanges has been far more pleasant than what I have had with skeptopaths in the past."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wonder Warthog, two questions:

1) Have I shown any sign of being "anti-science" on this thread?

2) After our conversation here, would you classify me as a "skeptopath"?

[Kevmo]

1) Have I shown any sign of being “anti-science” on this thread?
***Are you changing your viewpoint? It was only a few short days ago that you called me a seagull and a brainwasher on another thread. And what exactly is it that would change your viewpoint, a replication of a 10 year old result? Why didn’t you examine the evidence 9 years ago? Why is it that you need a big-name enterprise to acknowledge a simple replication? That is not science, that is elitism. Maybe a step below being a skeptopath, but perhaps one attitude leads to the other. Are you still clinging to elitism as a scientific prerequisite?