Replies

If you're so busy doing science as you say, then maybe ignore the naysayers here? Why post here at all? Unless this be some sort of self-image ego thing, with yourself being a part of the science priesthood. Or a wannabe.

Drop the personal attack approach, quit taking it personal yourself if somebody comments negatively, and much conflict will be avoided. But what do you do? You brought insult, right out of the gate...for what reason...to cover the embarrassment that is Rossi? LOL right at you Mr. scientist. ROTFLMAO.

Simply solution. Go with what some of your own sources say concerning Rossi (sorry, lost the link) and distance yourself from that guy, even if it may take admitting to yourself the possibility of having had otherwise justifiable hopes misplaced in that person's work.

"If you're so busy doing science as you say, then maybe ignore the naysayers here? Why post here at all? Unless this be some sort of self-image ego thing, with yourself being a part of the science priesthood. Or a wannabe."

I post here because as a practicing scientist, I have an obligation to speak the truth about matters of science. I have and will continue to do so.

"Drop the personal attack approach, quit taking it personal yourself if somebody comments negatively, and much conflict will be avoided.

I suggest you go back through the early threads and see who first entered "assault mode", and the MANY efforts I made to try to re-focus the discussion on the science.

"But what do you do? You brought insult, right out of the gate...for what reason...to cover the embarrassment that is Rossi? LOL right at you Mr. scientist. ROTFLMAO.

LOL. A line or two in the article refers to Rossi, and that's all you can see.

"Simply solution. Go with what some of your own sources say concerning Rossi (sorry, lost the link) and distance yourself from that guy, even if it may take admitting to yourself the possibility of having had otherwise justifiable hopes misplaced in that person's work.

Excuse me?? I have ALWAYS admitted the possibility that Rossi might be fradulent, or simply wrong. But the totality of evidence at this point in time simply doesn't support either of those conclusions.