No, it was not more than enough, not even close to enough. But at least there is a small subset of facts we can agree on, which is that they did some research in the early 1990’s. Some of it is available here
http://lenr-canr.org/index/menu/menu.php
which, of course, you won’t be reading because you never read this stuff.
http://lenr-canr.org/index/menu/menu.php
link.
Collecting and publishing all 3936 of those references was certainly a laborious task and a worthy contribution to the literature on the subject.
I particularly admire the online format. IMHO, that could well be the prototype for a superior standard for online bibliography / reference list formats.
~~~~~~
Of course, one can hardly miss the third reference -- and hope that it is not indicative of the standard of quality applied for inclusion in the list... '-)
Nonetheless, thank you for the link!