[BlueDragon]

And here I thought all along that skepticism was a required thing...

But congratulations. Seagulls have been successfully transmuted into skeptopaths before our very eyes.
I guess that beats waving pom-poms;

Rossi-Rossi he's got a [E-CAT] plan
He can heat water like nobody can!

So after the home team drops back and punts, enough lose interest including the "opposing team" that all one needs do is bring some breathless, hyper-ventilating article that links purported basis for all this ducks(?) coming-home-to-roost editorializing um-phah to another article which withholds certain data behind a pay-wall.

The home team can then pick up the months ago punted ball, with much or most of the methodology used to achieve results hidden from view. The "football" having always been much in the shape of a black box...

Now there are, or can arguably be good enough reasons for claimed results only being spoken of (even in form of graphical imagery), and results chiefly summarized... But that doesn't exactly get the ball fully over the goal line, scoring the decisive "win", giving the pom-pom wavers reason to gloat. Not quite yet.

Who's spackling who around here?

Here is a man asking the question
Is this really the end of the world?
Seagull, you must have known for a long time
The shape of things to come.
? Now you fly, through the sky, never asking why,?
And you fly all around 'til somebody, Shoots you down

[Kevmo]

The home team can then pick up the months ago punted ball,
***ETFOOM. I was posting LENR articles before Rossi came along, and I’ll be posting them after he leaves the scene.

[Wonder Warthog]

"And here I thought all along that skepticism was a required thing..."

HONEST skepticism is certainly a requirement......but part of HONEST skepticism is a willingness to actually examine presented data. Pathological skeptics refuse to do so. How much study have YOU done of the science behind LENR??