Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ExxonPatrolUs

I was speaking of the low flow variety. Forgot to mention that. I wouldn’t even think of using a no flow dry one.


29 posted on 12/06/2012 8:05:16 PM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: al_c

The irony is that trains and planes have “no-water” toilets which are VERY powerful. However, I don’t know just how much “energy” we “waste” making that work OK. Kind of like the damnable asshats who say all we need to do for our lo-flows of 1.6 is get an electric assist!

You can’t have it both ways.


33 posted on 12/06/2012 8:11:25 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: al_c

ever see a 5 gallon pail? you have seen a dry toilet.


53 posted on 12/06/2012 8:48:18 PM PST by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson